QC Safety Shoes: On Does Not Make Them β Here Is What to Buy
On makes running, walking and hiking shoes. It does not make occupational safety footwear, and no On product carries a safety-toe or slip-resistance standard.
By Azaz Khan Β· Published August 14, 2026
Quick answer
QC is On, and On does not make occupational safety footwear. We could find no On product carrying ASTM F2413 for safety toe or ASTM F3445 for slip resistance. On sells running, walking and hiking shoes. If you need work footwear, buy from a brand that states a standard on the listing rather than one that only claims slip resistance.
Key takeaways
- On makes no safety or occupational footwear. No safety toe, no slip-resistance standard.
- ASTM F2413 covers safety toe. ASTM F3445 covers slip resistance. They are different standards.
- An ASTM number on a listing is not automatically a slip-resistance standard β check the number.
- We checked five work and nursing shoes and none cited a slip-resistance standard.
- Wearing a running shoe on a wet commercial floor is the actual risk here.
Last reviewed
Quick comparison
| Product | Best for | slip standard cited | outer material | sole | closure | outsole | best use | Price | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hawkwell Cloud Zero Active (ASTM F3445) Hawkwell | the only certified option we have found | ASTM F3445 (stated as certified outsole) | Knit | Rubber | Lace-up | β | β | β | Check price |
| Skechers Summits Colsin Bungee (Work, Slip-ins) Skechers | service and healthcare shifts, with a caveat | β | β | β | Slip-in (hands free) | Slip-resistant | Service, hospitality, healthcare | β | Check price |
| Cherokee Melody Nursing Clog Cherokee | healthcare, if you want a leather upper | β | β | β | β | Slip-resistant | Healthcare shifts | β | Check price |
On does not make safety shoes
If you searched for QC safety shoes, you are looking for On β the logo is a capital O against a capital N, misread as QC. The QC shoes explainer covers that in full.
The direct answer: On does not make occupational or safety footwear.
On sells running, walking, training and hiking shoes. We could find no On product carrying either of the standards that define work footwear:
| Standard | Covers | On product carrying it |
|---|---|---|
| ASTM F2413 | Protective footwear, safety toe | None found |
| ASTM F3445 | Slip resistance on wet, contaminated floors | None found |
That is not a criticism of On. It makes athletic footwear and makes no claim to anything else. It just means that if you need a work shoe, this brand is not where the answer is.
What you actually need to check
The useful thing to take away is not a brand. It is a number.
βSlip-resistantβ is not a regulated term. In the United States there is no requirement to test a shoe before printing it on the box. Any outsole can carry the phrase.
ASTM F3445 is the standard that gives it meaning. It measures a complete shoeβs coefficient of friction on wet and contaminated surfaces and reports an actual figure.
We explain how to check any listing in ten seconds, and what we found when we checked ours, in what βslip-resistantβ actually means.
The trap worth knowing
An ASTM number on a listing is not automatically a slip-resistance standard.
One of the work shoes we checked cites ASTM F2892 β which covers electrical hazard protection β while claiming slip resistance with nothing behind it. The manufacturer names a standard when it holds one.
So read the number, not the letters:
- F3445 or F2913 β slip resistance was tested
- F2413 or F2892 β real standards, but for toe protection or electrical hazard, not grip
- Nothing β βslip-resistantβ is marketing language on that listing
What we found when we checked
We searched five work and nursing listings sold as slip-resistant for any mention of a testing standard.
None of them cited one.
We later found exactly one product that does: a nursing shoe whose feature bullet reads βASTM F3445 CERTIFIED OUTSOLEβ. It is in the comparison above. Its caveat is a knit upper, which handles grip but not fluids.
That ratio is the point. Certification is rare enough that finding it is genuinely informative.
Can you wear On shoes for work at all?
It depends on the floor, and the honest answer splits cleanly:
Fine: an office, a shop floor that stays dry, a job with no safety-toe requirement. At that point they are just shoes, and comfort is the only question.
Not fine: a commercial kitchen, a hospital ward, a warehouse, a restaurant, anywhere fluids reach the floor. Not because On makes bad shoes, but because road-running outsoles are designed for a different surface, and mesh uppers do not stop a spill.
There is also a comfort mismatch people miss. Standing all day is a sustained-load problem, not an impact problem. Running shoes are built to absorb repeated impacts; static weight compresses that foam faster. We cover what actually works in shoes for standing all day.
Buy this way instead
- Decide whether you need a safety toe. If your workplace requires one, filter for ASTM F2413 and nothing else matters until that is satisfied.
- If the floor gets wet or greasy, search the listing for ASTM F3445.
- Check the upper. Mesh is a poor choice anywhere fluids land, whatever the sole is rated for.
- Check the width before the cushioning. Most end-of-shift foot pain is a width problem.
For healthcare specifically, we compare the options and the mesh problem in womenβs slip-resistant nursing shoes. For general work footwear, see menβs slip-resistant work shoes.
The picks in detail
#1 Β· Best for the only certified option we have found
Hawkwell Cloud Zero Active (ASTM F3445)
Hawkwell
What we liked
- + Feature bullet states "ASTM F3445 CERTIFIED OUTSOLE" β a real tested claim
- + The standard appears in the product title, not buried
- + Built for healthcare shifts
What we didn't
- β Knit upper, so it addresses grip and not fluids
- β Women's only
#2 Β· Best for service and healthcare shifts, with a caveat
Skechers Summits Colsin Bungee (Work, Slip-ins)
Skechers
What we liked
- + Established brand with consistent sizing
- + Slip-in heel genuinely helps mid-shift
- + Cites ASTM F2892 for electrical hazard, so the brand does certify
What we didn't
- β Claims slip resistance but cites NO slip-resistance standard
- β Memory foam compresses over months of daily wear
#3 Β· Best for healthcare, if you want a leather upper
Cherokee Melody Nursing Clog
Cherokee
What we liked
- + Leather upper β genuinely better than mesh where fluids reach the floor
- + Established healthcare-uniform brand
What we didn't
- β Claims slip resistance with no ASTM standard cited
- β Clog construction gives less lockdown than laces
Our verdict
There is no such thing as a QC safety shoe, because On does not make occupational footwear. If you came here looking for one, the useful answer is what to buy instead β and the filter is the standard, not the brand. Search any listing for ASTM F3445 and buy something that names it. Almost nothing does, which is exactly why it is worth checking. If your floor stays dry and there is no safety-toe requirement, an ordinary shoe is fine and this whole question does not apply to you.
Frequently asked questions
Does On make safety shoes?
No. On sells running, walking, training and hiking footwear. We could find no On product carrying ASTM F2413 for safety toe protection or ASTM F3445 for slip resistance, and On does not market occupational footwear.
Are QC shoes slip resistant?
Not in any tested sense. No On shoe we could find cites ASTM F3445, the standard that gives the phrase meaning. On outsoles are designed for road and trail grip, which is a different problem from a wet, greasy commercial floor.
Can I wear QC shoes for work?
It depends entirely on the floor. For an office or a dry shop floor with no safety-toe requirement, they are just shoes and they are fine. For a kitchen, a hospital ward, a warehouse or anywhere fluids reach the floor, buy footwear that states a standard.
What is the difference between ASTM F2413 and ASTM F3445?
F2413 covers protective footwear, including safety toe caps rated to withstand impact. F3445 covers slip resistance, measuring a whole shoe's coefficient of friction on wet contaminated surfaces. A shoe can carry one and not the other, so read the number rather than the letters ASTM.
Are QC shoes good for nurses?
They are cushioned, but they miss two things healthcare needs: no tested slip resistance, and mesh uppers that do not stop fluids. Standing all day is also a sustained-load problem rather than an impact one, and On offers limited arch support and few widths.
What should I buy instead of QC shoes for work?
Search the listing for ASTM F3445 and buy something that names it. Very few do β of five work and nursing shoes we checked, none cited a slip-resistance standard, though we did later find one certified nursing shoe. The standard is the filter, not the brand.
Related reviews
Men's Slip-Resistant Work Shoes: We Checked What's Actually Certified
We searched both listings for a slip-resistance standard. One cites ASTM β for a different property. The other is not a work shoe at all.
Women's Slip-Resistant Nursing Shoes β Cherokee vs AEHAO vs Hawkwell
Healthcare has requirements other work shoes ignore. Mesh uppers are the mistake almost everyone makes.
BC Shoes: Which Ones to Buy (and What They Actually Are)
If you searched BC shoes and meant the athletic ones with the pod soles, that is On. Here are the three models worth buying and which one suits you.